Skip navigation

By default, every version of Windows since XP creates thumbnail database files that store small versions of every picture in every folder you browse into with Windows Explorer. These files are used to speed up thumbnail views in folders, but they have some serious disadvantages:

  1. They are created automatically without ever asking you if you want to use them.
  2. Deleting an image file doesn’t necessary delete it from the thumbnail database. The only way to delete the thumbnail is to delete the database (and hope you deleted the correct one…and that it’s not stored in more than one database!)
  3. These files consume a relatively small amount of disk space.
  4. The XP-style (which is also Vista/7/8 style when browsing network shares) “Thumbs.db” and the Windows Media Center “ehthumbs_vista.db” files are marked as hidden, but if you make an archive (such as a ZIP file) or otherwise copy the folder into a container that doesn’t support hidden attributes, not only does the database increase the size of the container required, it also gets un-hidden!
  5. If you write software, it can interfere with software version control systems. They may also update the timestamp on the folder they’re in, causing some programs to think your data in the folder has changed when it really hasn’t.
  6. If you value your privacy (particularly if you handle any sort of sensitive information) these files leave information behind that can be used to compromise that privacy, especially when in the hands of anyone with even just a casual understanding of forensic analysis, be it the private investigator hired by your spouse or the authorities (police, FBI, NSA, CIA, take your pick).

To shut them off completely, you’ll need to change a few registry values that aren’t available through normal control panels (and unavailable in ANY control panels on any Windows version below a Pro, Enterprise, or Ultimate version). Fortunately, someone has already created the necessary .reg files to turn the local thumbnail caches on or off in one shot. The registry file data was posted by Brink to SevenForums. The files at that page will disable or enable this feature locally. These will also shut off (or turn on) Windows Vista and higher creating “Thumbs.db” files on all of your network drives and shares.

If you want to delete all of the “Thumbs.db” style files on a machine that has more than a couple of them, open a command prompt (Windows key + R, then type “cmd” and hit enter) and type the following commands (yes, the colon after the “a” is supposed to be followed by an empty space):

cd \

del /s /a: Thumbs.db

del /s /a: ehthumbs_vista.db

This will enter every directory on the system hard drive and delete all of the Thumbs.db files. You may see some errors while this runs, but such behavior is normal. If you have more drives that need to be cleaned, you can type the drive letter followed by a colon (such as “E:” if you have a drive with that letter assigned to it, for example) and hit enter, then repeat the above two commands to clean them.

The centralized thumbnail databases for Vista and up are harder to find. You can open the folder quickly by going to Start, copy-pasting this into the search box with CTRL+V, and hitting enter:

%LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer

Close all other Explorer windows that you have open to unlock as many of the files as possible. Delete everything that you see with the word “thumb” at the beginning. Some files may not be deletable; if you really want to get rid of them, you can start a command prompt, start Task Manager, use it to kill all “explorer.exe” processes, then delete the files manually using the command prompt:

cd %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer

del thumb*

rd /s thumbcachetodelete

When you’re done, either type “explorer” in the command prompt, or in Task Manager go to File > New Task (Run)… and type “explorer”. This will restart your Explorer shell so you can continue using Windows normally.

I decided this month that it was time to look at replacing my AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE chip with something that could transcode high-definition video faster. Sure enough, I chose the AMD FX-9590 CPU. Arguments against the AMD FX-9590 on forums such as Tom’s Hardware and AnandTech include “power efficiency is too low/TDP is too high” and “Intel has higher/better instructions per clock (IPC)” and “Intel’s i7 performs so much better.” Notably, the price to obtain the superior Intel performance was almost completely ignored in these discussions. Consider that the AMD FX-9590 retails for around $260 and the Intel Core i7-4770K it is often compared to costs $335; that $75 difference is enough cash to buy a cheap motherboard or a 120GB SSD, and also represents a 29% price increase over the FX-9590. Does the i7-4770K really perform 29% better than the FX-9590? The short answer is “no.” The long exception to that otherwise straightforward answer is “unless you spend all of your time calculating Julia mandelbrot sets and the digits of pi.”

Over two years ago, I wrote an article about how AMD CPUs beat Intel CPUs hands down when you factor in the price you pay compared to the performance you get. Most of the arguments I received against my assertion were against the single-figure synthetic benchmark (PassMark) I used to establish a value for CPU performance. This is understandable; synthetic benchmarks that boil down to “One Number To Rule Them All” don’t help you decide if a CPU is good for your specific computer workload. This time, I’ve sought out a more in-depth benchmark data set which can be seen here. I compiled some the relevant figures (excluding most of the gaming benchmarks) into a spreadsheet along with the Newegg retail price of each CPU as of 2014-10-23, used a dash of math to convert “lower is better” scores into an arbitrary “higher is better” value and some fixed multipliers per benchmark to make them all fit into one huge graph which can be downloaded here: cpu_performance_comparison.xls

And now, ladies and gentlemen, the moment you’ve been waiting for: a graph of a wide variety of CPU benchmarks, scaled by the price you pay for each CPU (click to expand the image.)

amd_fx-9590_vs_intel_core_i7CPUs in each bar series are ordered by retail price in ascending order. The FX-9590 is in yellow on the left of each series and Intel only has a CPU that beats the AMD offering in 4 out of 17 price-scaled benchmarks, most of which are synthetic and don’t represent any typical real-world workloads.

AMD wins again.

Update: In case you needed more proof that the FX-9590 is the best encoding chip, someone sent me a few links to more x264 benchmarks: 1 2 3

THREATEN TO CONTACT A LAWYER.

You should know that I am not a lawyer; however, I find that when a large company seems to not care, the possibility of getting a lawyer involved when you have been genuinely wronged by them gets you the attention needed to resolve the situation.

For a couple of years now, Newegg has been rejecting RMAs on motherboards with LGA-style CPU sockets and they always say that “item was received with apparent end-user caused physical damage to the CPU socket contact pins.” There are plenty of stories about this bad behavior all over the Internet. In fact, I have experienced this problem personally and written about it from the persepctive of boycotting the people who engineered the socket that allows for such easy breakage and is exploited by Newegg for RMA rejection.

If you receive a notice that your RMA was rejected for this reason, talk to customer service and tell them that you believe that their RMA technicians caused the damage to void the RMA. If they refuse to process the RMA, don’t waste time asking for a supervisor; instead, tell them that your lawyer will be very interested in this situation and ask them for the contact information for Newegg’s legal department. Also ask for the customer service agent’s name and their internal company identification number so they can be subpoenaed to testify if a lawsuit against Newegg is filed.

This communicates a few things that may magically get your RMA problems solved. One, it tells customer service that you are someone who will not let this issue go and will fight it in the legal arena if needed, a situation that no company wants (especially considering the widespread accounts of Newegg’s behavior). Two, it gives the company an added incentive to not screw you over and could cause a “good faith exception” to the policy be granted to you.

Another excellent outlet for getting your problems resolved is to email the VP of customer relations (or public relations)  or someone relevant under the “Investor Relations” section of the website. These people have a very strong interest in the company’s success. Don’t email the legal department. If you need to get your lawyer involved, your lawyer can do that.

If you buy a new motherboard and want to “cover your ass…”

  1. When the package arrives, DO NOT OPEN IT YET!
  2. Get something that takes decent quality video. Most phones will take excellent video if you don’t use an “MMS compatible” recording mode which records terrible quality video.
  3. Record a video of the entire unboxing process, from cutting the packing tape to removing the motherboard box to opening the board to inspecting the CPU socket closely for damage.
  4. That part is important: inspect the CPU socket for damage with the camera. If there is anything wrong, put it all back together on camera, seal the motherboard box with tape, and RMA it immediately.
  5. DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES attempt to use a board that appears to have socket pin damage. This could blow up your CPU and could cause your RMA to have other reasons to be rejected.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers

%d bloggers like this: